Start with primary evidence
For factual claims, prefer original reports, official documentation and the underlying public record. Identify the edition or date when it matters. A link is useful only if it supports the nearby claim. A report about a broad market does not validate an individual project.
Make the inference visible
Our analysis connects facts and asks what they might imply. We label that step as interpretation and explain the conditions on which it depends. A forecast is a scenario with assumptions, rather than an observed result.
Expose the numbers
Constructed scenarios are labelled as hypothetical. Show units, formulas and excluded costs. Keep physical consumption, productive technical use and commercial revenue separate. A calculator result inherits its input assumptions.
Keep uncertainty useful
Name the unresolved fact that could change the next commitment. Where outcomes depend on several inputs, separate their effects before combining them. Explain what evidence would cause the assessment to change.
Correct the record
Send a correction with the article link, the disputed passage and supporting evidence. We review substantive corrections and, when an article is revised, should identify the change and its date. A reader's disagreement is a reason to examine the argument, not proof of an error.
Illustrations
Some editorial images are generated with AI and labelled as illustrative. They do not document a named facility, project or measured result.
Commercial transparency
If a future article contains paid placement, sponsorship or affiliate links, it should be labelled where the reader encounters it. This edition has no checkout or paid subscription. Contact is by email; following the project is available through X.
Scope
Our materials are educational analysis. They do not establish a project's profitability, a product's suitability for every task or compliance with jurisdiction-specific rules. Assessments of real projects need their own current evidence.
Send a correction ↗